Today is 11 Ahau 18 Sotz’

1280 shopping days until 4 Ahau 3 K’ank’in.

Update: Embedding of this YouTube video has been “disabled by request” but it still can be viewed via this link:

Little Sister is watching from the rooftops of Tehran.

Eric Blair, aka George Orwell, created the powerful meme, “Big Brother.” Since his novel 1984 was published in 1948, Big Brother and its associated memes have propagated, as we now say, virally, throughout the ’O Spheres of human culture. I would like to suggest a new meme as an overlay and even a successor to Big Brother: Little Sister.

Who is Little Sister? To quote another great mememaker, Walt Kelly, as spoken by his character and avatar Pogo,  ”Yep, son, we have met the enemy and he is us.”  We have met Little Sister, and She is us.  Put an Orwellian twist on the paraphrase, and it becomes,

We are Little Sister, and we are watching us.

Little Sister is everyone who carries a cellphone with a digital camera that can upload pics and viddy to the intertubes. Little Sister is the “Macaca” who provided now former Senator George Allen an opportunity to destroy his political career.  Little Sister is the 3 or more BART riders who viddied BART policeman Johannes Mehserle shooting Oscar Grant as Grant lay prone on the floor of the car. Little Sister is an emergent property of people interacting via the ever-faster global communications grid and all the technologies, software, and infrastructure that make, extend, and connect it.

In my opinion, Little Sister trumps Big Brother. To be a bit derisive about it, Big Brother is sooo Twentieth Century. Little Sister needs no Ministry of Love, no Ministry of Truth. Little Sister is distributed. Little Sister is every blogger, every person with a Facebook or a YouTube or a Twitter or Vodpod or Identica or whatever the lubed up social tool is the latest trend–o-ware to backdoor the Internet. Little Sister is every person who has an email account, even if that person is a homeless person who accesses his email via a computer at the Public Library.

Big Brother is top down, Little Sister is bottom up. Little Sister benefits from the flatness of the infosphere as it now stands, Big Brother must contend with it.  Big Brother seeks total order; total control. Little Sister is random and nondeterministic, technology-enabled anarchy incarnate. Little Sister has the wide world under surveillance, yet defeats surveillance. Every discrete bit of Little Sister is like a subatomic particle: If you know where it is, you don’t know which way it’s going; if you know which way it’s going, you don’t know where it is. Big Brother is as often suborned by Little Sister as the other way around. I’m not saying that Big Brother is going away, but there’s a new gal in town.

Little Sister does have a significant, or shall I say signal, weakness: Her continued operation is utterly dependent on the Res Technica, the aforesaid global grid, the noose-sphere into which humankind has stuck its collective neck. Given a massive fail of any portion of the infrastructure, the blue screen of death awaits her, and we take the long fall.

I posted the screed above on 11 Men 13 Pohp/April 16, 2009, just over a month ago.  Now Little Sister is speaking to the world in Farsi, and breaking our hearts even though we can’t understand a word.  We hear gunshots, hear screams, see fire and people running, men in white shirts shooting from a balcony. Are they shooting at protesters or are they protesters shooting back?

It’s Little Sister versus Big Brother, but it’s also Little Sister interacting with Big Brother, and vice versa. Little Sister tends to disrupt the status quo, though on occasion Little Sister does bolster it as well. More the former than the latter. Depends on what the status quo is that day, or rather, that millisecond.

But Little Sister is a process, not a creed. It is powered by people who have access to the technologies that allow them to input and output to the grid, but it doesn’t necessarily promote People Power, anymore than evolution by natural selection promotes the political creeds of the very ill named Social Darwinism, Manifest Destiny, or any ism or  idea of human progress. Like the process of natural selection, Little Sister has no goal and no values of herself, even though  she is an unintended creation of human actions and human instrumentality.

The technologies are being exploited by everyone who has access to them, for any conceivable good or ill. Access cannot be controlled at all times by any one authority or set of authorities. Little Sister arises from the properties of these technologies, and creates user capabilities unforeseen by any authority. Big Brother is a nickname for totalitarianism, a political system that worships, and attempts to preserve, absolute power for the few. Little Sister is the nickname I propose for the fruitful high tech anarchy in which most of us find ourselves living. Big Brother was purpose made; Little Sister just happened.

Now all eyes of Little Sister are on Iran. The vast majority of people who are using the instantly generated widget to turn their Twitter avatars green in solidarity with the protesters in Iran do not have any real understanding of the politics involved. They do not for the most part know the sordid history of the United States interventions in Iranian affairs, including the CIA plot concocted by Kermit Roosevelt that deposed the  fairly elected President Mossadeq in 1953, and our subsequent massive support of the ridiculous but oppressive comic opera that was the  regime of Shah Reza Pahlavi, which the Islamic Revolution overthrew in the late  Seventies.

About the least useful thing any concerned American can do–particularly an American politician–is act like a buttinski with a bouquet of Freedom Fries and root root root for the Iranian opposition as if they were  latter day Sons of Liberty. It’s patronizing and arrogant, not to mention counterproductive. The “Greens” are not a secular democratic movement in the Western mode. The Iranian protesters are chanting Allahu Akbar as they march in the streets, in emulation of the Islamic Revolution that overthrew the US-backed Shah, not the American Revolution. The Greens in Iran are not secular; they see Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Ali K as betraying the Islamic Revolution, not forcing it on them.

Yes, Mousavi is a gentler, kinder face of Persian Shia Islam, but, per Daniel Larison, it ain’t Zorasterians out there in the streets. They seek reform not overthrow. Not necessarily a bad thing, but it’s still political Islam. The Ayatollahs are not going away. If we’re very lucky, they will eventually become something like the equivalent of the English monarchy/House of Lords/Church of England prelates. The way things look right now, that may take some time.

In my opinion greening your avatar is like drinking green beer and declaring yourself Irish on St. Patrick’s day. It saves about as many lives as slapping a yellow ribbon magnet on your SUV.

By the way, ‘real’ Irish pubs in the States tend to close on St. Paddy’s Day; the proprietors don’t like faux Irishman wrecking the bar & pulling urinals out of the bathroom wall. They call it “the puking of the green.”

But Little Sister is speaking to the world in Farsi, and she is breaking our hearts even though we can’t understand a word. The music of the words is more beautiful and more terrible because we don’t understand. The media mythologers of pop journalism are already at work misinforming themselves and everyone else, writing their own lyrics. Myth is like a big wave crashing into shore, it rears up and the surfers ride it in and think themselves heroes.

There was a man on a roof in Tehran, holding a digital camera in his shaky hands. That is no myth. That was a hero.


12 responses to “Today is 11 Ahau 18 Sotz’

  1. Pingback: tinydoctor's status on Saturday, 20-Jun-09 20:09:25 UTC -

  2. An extraordinary clip and a superb post, Dana. Orwell would have approved!

  3. “If we’re very lucky, they will eventually become something like the equivalent of the English monarchy/House of Lords/Church of England prelates”. I think you’ve got that right, Dr. O. Which means that Iran will morph into a copy of Perfidious Albion, extending its hegemony over the entire “Mid”East, all the while conjuring up its own Islamic holiness, and democracy, and justice and all that Anglicanish spin on a proper ochlocracy of plutopaths since Elizabeth the Oneth’s letters of marque and the pre-emptive personhood of Lord Baltimore’s sinecure of Maryland and the vetting of that “very model of the modern major” corporatocracy, The Hudson’s Bay Company. Get it on, there, greenies.
    …”those to whom evil is done // do evil in return”.

  4. Addressing the topic of bottom-up collectivism, which you touch upon, I highly recommend “The New Socialism” in the June 2009 issue of Wired magazine.

  5. “The music of the words is more beautiful and more terrible because we don’t understand. ”

    Well, said, Doc. All of it.

    Several years ago I took a class on the Middle East taught by an Iranian expat — right before my husband went to Israel for an adult Jewish travel school. Things got interesting at my house, and still do every once in a while. Not that this tidbit illuminates your points, but that conversations about intensely historical & difficult subjects are rife with passion. To discuss, review, revise, consider — and not just fly colors — is the most important thing.

    Thanks for your post.

  6. (I do like my green avatar on the comment, though. Nearly matches my green head.)

  7. Definitely erudite and insightful commentary . . . I tend to stay away from politics as a blogger because I feel I don’t have the adequate understanding of national histories to blog politics.

    Not knowing your history or background, whether you’re Persian or American, I feel these comments are much necessary and they add some dimension to a media flurry that is more or less superficial toward understanding the Iranian situation.

    This is definitely not a “quixotic pseudo-spiritual prognostication.” By coining a new term “Little Sister” you add an interesting cultural analysis of the bigger (new) media picture and how it enmeshes all of us for good or ill.

    People will always act with naivety toward political events they don’t fully understand. I don’t know if that is “patronizing and arrogant”. See the green avatars as an act of good will. I haven’t changed my avatar (@blogofinnocence) because I tend not to jump on bandwagons. But I still think these small gestures help to create the global village of the Internet.

  8. Thanks for coming over to read this, Lethe.

    Despite my blog moniker, my ancestry is mostly Scots from roundabout the Firth of Forth, and my nationality American.

    Hmm. Perhaps I should have desnarked that and said “perceived as patronizing and arrogant.”

    Good will can be patronizing, and willful naivety IS arrogant. Much if not most arrogant and patronizing behavior is unconscious, and the perps thereof are usually either indignant or oblivious when called on it.

    I’m just a bit too fond of putting pins to bubbles. Clarissa cut the snark when she posted a version of this as a guest essay on The Moderate Voice, and in doing so was a wiser editor than I.

  9. Pingback: Today is 6 Manik’ 5 Yaxk’in « Dr. Omed’s Tent Show Revival

  10. Pingback: Facebook Feminism: Wear a Tiara | Dr. Omed's Tent Show Revival

  11. Hello, Neat post. There’s an issue with your website in internet explorer, might check this? IE still is the market chief and a huge element of other folks will miss your excellent writing because of this problem.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s